Essay on "The Future of Scientism"

Introduction

In the relentless pursuit of knowledge, humanity has witnessed the rise of scientism as a dominant paradigm shaping our understanding of the world. 

Scientism often hailed for its emphasis on logic and systematic study, has undeniably contributed to significant advancements in various fields. 

However, this intellectual framework is not without its criticisms, particularly concerning its impact on moral values and the neglect of human emotions. 

In this essay, we delve into the multifaceted aspects of scientism, exploring its influence on moral development, and emotional intelligence, and the potential consequences it may have on the ethical compass of future generations.

Scientism's Impact on Moral Values

A central critique of scientism revolves around its perceived role in reducing moral values among individuals. In the pursuit of empirical evidence and rational understanding, the ethical dimensions of human existence can become overshadowed. While science can provide insights into the consequences of actions, it often falls short in offering a comprehensive framework for determining what is morally right or wrong.

Morality, traditionally rooted in religious or philosophical beliefs, is increasingly challenged by a scientistic worldview that prioritizes empirical evidence over abstract values. The danger lies in a society where moral decisions are solely based on measurable outcomes rather than a deeper understanding of the principles that govern ethical conduct. As scientism tightens its grip on public discourse, there is a growing concern that moral relativism may become the norm, leading to a potential erosion of shared values that bind societies together.

 

Emotional Intelligence in the Shadow of Scientism

Another facet of concern arises from the predominant focus of scientism on logic and systematic study, often neglecting the rich tapestry of human emotions and feelings. Emotional intelligence, a crucial aspect of human development, encompasses the ability to perceive, understand, and manage emotions, both in oneself and others. While scientism has undeniably enhanced our cognitive capabilities, the danger lies in the devaluation of emotional intelligence, a trait that is essential for building meaningful relationships and fostering empathy.

In a world increasingly dominated by technological advancements and data-driven decision-making, the risk is that individuals may become emotionally detached, relying solely on logic to navigate complex human interactions. The consequences of this emotional vacuum could manifest in societal fragmentation, as people may struggle to connect on a deeper, more empathetic level. Recognizing the importance of emotional intelligence within the framework of scientism is crucial for maintaining the social fabric that binds diverse communities.

 

The Moral Vacuum in Today's Children

A pressing concern is the perceived disconnect between scientism and the moral development of today's children. As the influence of traditional moral teachings wanes, the responsibility falls on educational systems and societal structures to impart values that transcend the purely empirical. Children, growing up in an age dominated by technology and scientific advancements, may find it challenging to discern the nuances of good and bad without a moral compass.

The absence of a moral foundation, often rooted in religious or philosophical teachings, may lead to a generation that struggles to understand the deeper implications of their actions. Scientism, in its emphasis on empirical evidence and measurable outcomes, may inadvertently contribute to a moral vacuum where children lack a clear understanding of right and wrong, truth and lie. It is imperative to bridge the gap between scientific knowledge and moral education to ensure the holistic development of future generations.

The Creator's Message as a Moral Guide

In navigating the challenges posed by scientism, it becomes essential to reconsider the role of the creator's message as a moral guide. Whether rooted in religious or philosophical traditions, these messages often provide a moral framework that transcends the limitations of empirical evidence. While scientism may excel in uncovering the intricacies of the physical world, it may fall short in addressing the profound questions of purpose, morality, and the human experience.

The creator's message, whether interpreted through religious scriptures or philosophical teachings, offers a moral anchor that can guide individuals through the complexities of life. By embracing these timeless principles, one can derive a sense of purpose and moral clarity that goes beyond the empirical realm. It is crucial to recognize that the pursuit of scientific knowledge and moral values can coexist harmoniously, offering a more comprehensive understanding of the human experience.

 

Conclusion: Nurturing a Balanced Future

In contemplating the future of scientism, it is imperative to strike a delicate balance between the pursuit of scientific knowledge and the preservation of moral values and emotional intelligence. As we navigate the uncharted waters of technological advancement, we must not lose sight of the essence of our humanity – our capacity for empathy, moral discernment, and emotional connection.

Scientism, while a powerful tool for understanding the physical world, should not overshadow the importance of moral education and the cultivation of emotional intelligence. The moral vacuum perceived in today's children necessitates a concerted effort to integrate scientific knowledge with timeless moral teachings, ensuring a holistic approach to education that prepares individuals for the complexities of the modern world.

In the intelligent design of our future, let us be mindful of the intricate interplay between science and morality. By embracing the wisdom embedded in the creator's message and acknowledging the value of emotional intelligence, we can forge a path forward that honors both the empirical and the ethereal, creating a society that thrives not only in knowledge but also in compassion and understanding.

Read More

Essay on The Limits of Science for Explaining Life after death

 Science, the cornerstone of our understanding of the physical world, has revolutionized our lives. From curing diseases to exploring the cosmos, it stands as a testament to human curiosity and ingenuity.

 Yet, for all its power, science has inherent limitations. It cannot definitively answer questions about the existence of an afterlife or the concept of creation.

This essay will explore the reasons behind these limitations, delving into the nature of scientific inquiry and its boundaries.

One of the fundamental limitations of science lies in its methodology. Science relies on the empirical method, a process of observation, hypothesis generation, experimentation, and analysis.

This method thrives on the ability to measure and observe phenomena. However, the concept of an afterlife, by definition, transcends the physical realm.

It deals with the continuation of consciousness after the death of the body, a phenomenon that cannot be directly observed or measured using current scientific tools.

Imagine trying to study the wind. We can observe its effects on leaves or feel it on our skin, but the wind itself is invisible. Similarly, the potential existence of an afterlife might leave traces or influence our world, but such traces might be beyond our current ability to detect.

Science can only offer explanations within the realm of the observable and measurable.

Another limitation is the issue of falsifiability. A core scientific principle states that a theory must be falsifiable, meaning there needs to be a way to disprove it through experiments or observations.

The concept of an afterlife, however, is not easily falsifiable. The inability to detect evidence of an afterlife doesn't necessarily disprove its existence, it simply means we haven't found a way to access it yet. This lack of falsifiability puts the idea of an afterlife outside the realm of scientific inquiry.

Therefore the fact of belief in the creator's message through messengers of God is the last and the only left concept for human beings.

Furthermore, science deals with the "how" rather than the "why". It can explain the biological processes that cease upon death, but it cannot definitively address the ultimate fate of consciousness. This question delves into the realm of philosophy and religion, which explore the nature of existence, consciousness, and the soul.

The concept of creation also presents a challenge for science.

Science excels at explaining how things change and evolve, but it struggles with the concept of absolute beginnings.

Current scientific theories, like the Big Bang, describe the origin of the universe from a very dense state, but they don't necessarily address the question of what existed before or what caused this initial state.

Moreover, scientific explanations often rely on existing natural laws. However, the concept of creation often implies the intervention of a force outside those natural laws, a concept that science, by definition, cannot explain within its current framework.

This doesn't mean science can't contribute to the discussion of creation. Scientific discoveries have informed theological debates about the origin of the universe and the nature of life. For example, the theory of evolution by natural selection has led to discussions about the compatibility of God and evolution.

The limitations outlined here don't diminish the power of science.

Science only studies the created object and cannot create from nothing. Whereas the Creator can create something from nothing. That is why Allah's other name is KHALIQ in the Quran. LHALIQ means one who can create something from nothing.

It allows us to understand the world around us in a way that was unimaginable before.

However, it's important to recognize that science is a tool, and like any tool, it has limitations. It excels at explaining the physical world through observable phenomena, but it cannot definitively answer all existential questions.

The human desire to understand the nature of death and the origin of existence is a powerful motivator.

While science may not offer definitive answers, it continues to push the boundaries of knowledge. Perhaps future scientific discoveries will provide new insights into these questions, or perhaps they will remain in the realm of philosophy and faith.

In conclusion, the limits of science lie in its inability to directly observe or measure the afterlife or the act of creation. Its focus on the "how" leaves the "why" unanswered. Despite these limitations, science and the search for meaning can coexist and complement each other. Science provides a powerful tool for understanding the world, while the search for meaning can inspire scientific inquiry and broaden our understanding of the universe.

Read More

Essay on The Limits of Science: Exploring the Boundaries of Human Knowledge

Introduction

Science, with its relentless pursuit of understanding the natural world, has undoubtedly transformed the way we perceive and interact with our surroundings. 

From unraveling the mysteries of the cosmos to decoding the intricate complexities of life at the molecular level, science has proven to be an invaluable tool for human progress.

 However, amidst its numerous achievements, it is crucial to recognize that science also has its limitations. This essay delves into the boundaries of scientific inquiry, exploring areas where science faces challenges and where its reach seems to be constrained.

The most challenging part:👉 science is unable to define the reason for the constant activities of the heavenly bodies. 

✔The science cannot challenge the prophetic revelation. 

🤷‍♀️Science cannot stop death. 👉Science cannot formulate human feelings and consciousness. 

🤷‍♂️ Science cannot stop the aging of human beings.  

✔ Science is unable to find the secret of hereafter this life.

The Methodological Limits of Science

One of the primary limitations of science lies in its methodology. Science relies on empirical evidence, experimentation, and observation to formulate hypotheses and theories. 

While this approach has been immensely successful in uncovering the laws governing the physical world, it encounters obstacles when confronted with phenomena that are beyond the scope of empirical observation. 

For instance, questions about the nature of consciousness, human emotions, or subjective experiences pose significant challenges to scientific inquiry.

Consciousness, often regarded as the pinnacle of human experience, remains a subject of great mystery. Despite advances in neuroscience, understanding how the brain generates consciousness is an elusive goal. 

The subjective nature of consciousness, coupled with the limitations of current scientific methods, hinders a comprehensive scientific explanation. As philosopher Thomas Nagel famously stated, there is "something it is like" to be conscious, a quality that escapes reductionist approaches.

Moreover, ethical considerations further limit the scope of scientific experiments, particularly when studying human behavior. Many aspects of human behavior, such as morality, ethics, and individual values, are shaped by complex interplays of cultural, social, and psychological factors. Conducting controlled experiments in these domains often proves challenging due to the inherent variability and subjectivity of human experiences.

The Uncertainty Principle in Quantum Mechanics

In the realm of the very small, quantum mechanics introduces a fundamental limit to the precision with which certain pairs of properties can be simultaneously known. 

This uncertainty principle, formulated by Werner Heisenberg, implies that the more precisely we know one property of a particle, such as its position, the less precisely we can know another property, like its momentum. 

This inherent limitation challenges the classical notion of determinism, where the future state of a system could be predicted with absolute certainty if the present state were precisely known.

The implications of the uncertainty principle extend beyond the microscopic world of particles. It suggests a level of unpredictability inherent in the fabric of reality itself. 

While quantum mechanics has proven to be an immensely successful and accurate framework for describing the behavior of particles, the uncertainty principle raises philosophical questions about the nature of reality and the limits of human knowledge.

The Quest for a Unified Theory

In the realm of theoretical physics, the pursuit of a unified theory that seamlessly integrates the principles of general relativity and quantum mechanics has proven to be a formidable challenge.

 These two pillars of modern physics, successful in their respective domains, present inconsistencies when attempts are made to reconcile them into a single, all-encompassing framework.

General relativity, formulated by Albert Einstein, describes the force of gravity as the curvature of spacetime caused by mass and energy. On the other hand, quantum mechanics, developed to understand the behavior of particles at the subatomic level, relies on probabilistic models and wave-particle duality. 

Efforts to merge these theories face mathematical and conceptual hurdles, leading to the recognition that our current understanding may be incomplete or that a new paradigm is needed to encompass the full spectrum of physical phenomena.

The Limitations of Mathematical Models

While mathematics has been an indispensable tool for scientific inquiry, it is not without its limitations. Mathematical models are powerful tools for describing and predicting natural phenomena, but they are not infallible representations of reality. Models are simplifications and abstractions that capture certain aspects of a system while neglecting others. As the complexity of a system increases, the accuracy of mathematical models may diminish, and the predictions derived from them may become less reliable.

Climate science provides an illustrative example of the challenges associated with modeling complex systems. Earth's climate is influenced by a myriad of interconnected factors, including atmospheric composition, ocean currents, solar radiation, and human activities. Developing accurate climate models requires a deep understanding of these intricate interactions, and uncertainties arise due to incomplete data, the complexity of the systems involved, and the difficulty in predicting future human actions.

Ethical and Societal Limitations

Beyond the technical and methodological limits, science also faces constraints imposed by ethical considerations and societal values. Human experimentation, for example, is subject to strict ethical guidelines to ensure the well-being and autonomy of research subjects. This ethical framework, while essential for protecting individuals, can impede certain types of scientific investigations.

Furthermore, societal values and cultural perspectives can influence the direction of scientific research. Research topics that may be deemed controversial or ethically questionable may face resistance, funding challenges, or even censorship. The intersection of science with cultural, political, and religious beliefs can sometimes hinder the pursuit of knowledge in specific areas.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while science has achieved remarkable successes in unraveling the mysteries of the natural world, it is essential to acknowledge its inherent limitations. 

The methodological constraints, as well as the uncertainties introduced by quantum mechanics, highlight the frontiers where scientific understanding encounters barriers. The quest for a unified theory in physics underscores the need for humility in the face of the vast unknown. 

Mathematical models, while powerful, are not infallible, and the complex interplay of factors in certain systems poses challenges to accurate prediction.

Moreover, ethical considerations and societal values play a crucial role in shaping the boundaries of scientific inquiry. Consciousness, human behavior, and subjective experiences remain elusive to complete scientific explanation, emphasizing the limitations of empirical observation and experimentation.

It is imperative for scientists, philosophers, and society as a whole to engage in thoughtful dialogue about the boundaries of science. Recognizing these limits not only fosters a more nuanced understanding of the scientific endeavor but also encourages interdisciplinary collaboration and a broader appreciation of the diverse ways in which humans make sense of the world. 

While science has propelled us forward in countless ways, acknowledging its limits is a testament to the complexity and richness of the universe we seek to comprehend.

Read More

Essay: The Wind Turbine is Going to Save the Planet

The Wind Turbine is Going to Save the Planet. The main constraint is the feasibility of the cheapest technology. Hope computer and technology will solve it one day.

Many of them have a strong dedication to one discipline or another. Most of them have been exposed to what they know as children. Engineering is a big discipline and it is difficult. You have to be able to work with your hands on and you have to be able to think logically.

You can see that there are some fields of study that are very well paid. The sciences are not well paid for fun. There is a lot of work involved. But it is well worth it.

There are other fields of study that are not well paid for fun but are essential. You will see science and math are also required. The sciences are pretty well paid also. We have the best of both worlds here since we can work with both hands-on and we can make things with our minds.

There is a lot of confusion in the world:

The engineer or scientist will say there is a lot of confusion in the world right now. There is lots of bad stuff out there. We have to be able to do our part to eliminate some of the bad stuff. So engineers and scientists do build things.

Wind Turbine Engineering is based on complex gear arrangement:

For example, a large wind turbine has gears and more gears involved in the structure of the turbine. You can see the thought that goes into building a wind turbine. A scientist would study the variable of airflow and then measure the pressure and humidity in the area. There are things in the world we have to get better at. Engineers and Scientists do their part.

The first thing that strikes you about wind energy is that the wind turbines are always going, never stopped. Some wind energy companies are going to take on the challenge of making sure the turbines are going and working well so they are going to pay dividends to their owners for a long time.

Location is very important for Wind Turbine profitability:

Now some people say just put some cash in the bank and ride it out. Then you should sell the house when the wind turbine is going to the point that you can make the electricity to pay for the house. This is a good point for someone who lives in a windy area. You might have lots of wind blows. You could do this. For some, it won't work. You might be in a location that is too far north or south. There are ways to get the wind turbine to work in some places.

A good Mix of air pressure is an ideal place for Wind Turbine:

The first thing you should know about wind turbines is they are not good in a lot of places. They are best suited for places with a good mix of air pressure. If you live in the desert or highlands they aren't best suited. On the other hand, if you live in a place with lots of air pressure they are best suited.

where a wind turbine will work best:

There are also other factors that determine where a wind turbine will work best. You might want to use them more in areas that have lots of air pressure available. This is because a lot of the power that a wind turbine uses in converting energy is coming from a mix of air pressure.

Profitablity of Wind Turbine:

The cost of building and installing a wind turbine is going to run you about $2000 for the smallest turbines and $6000 for the biggest. That is a huge price tag to pay, but it is worth it because you will be doing your part to help fight global warming and the pollution problem that wind energy is creating.

Disadvantage:

The only disadvantage is you will have to do a little work, but it is doable. The work is putting the turbines on your land and making sure they are working well. The maintenance will cost you about $150 per month. The electricity that you get from the turbines will probably be around $20 per month. Your other options for electricity would be from a utility grid and from natural gas.

The initial investment is the only a deep concern:

After the initial investment, you will have a business that is growing. That is because you will be generating your own electricity. The income you will be getting is from wind turbine sales. The money you will save is going to be adding to your bank account. The last thing you want to do is run your wind turbine bank account out. You can always sell them for a profit.

This is a great way to help fight global warming. It won't take very long for the technology to be able to store wind energy and use it whenever we want.

Friends, You may also like this Video.

Read More

Essay on Science and Technology for School Students

What are science and technology? Give the difference. - This essay can also be a short difference between science and technology.

A little background and definitions will make it simple.

Science is a comprehensive analysis of nature:

Science has nothing to do with gods or religion. It is a comprehensive analysis of nature. If that is hard to understand, think of how other professions analyze information to produce knowledge. That is easy to understand.

Technology is the application of that knowledge

Technology is the application of that knowledge. From that definition, the difference between science and technology is the application of that science.

You could see a difference between an artist and a mechanic, a physicist and a computer scientist, or a psychologist and a programmer. All of these apply the science philosophy to analyze information to produce knowledge, but with very different purposes.

The application of science is guided by philosophy. The application of technology is not.

There is a difference between knowing and using. The same applies to the difference between a scientist and a technologist. The difference is the guiding principle.

A technologist applies technology as a tool, a tool to create, transform, and build. A scientist works alone to interpret and experiment. A programmer works alone to create and compile.

For a technologist, the philosophy is simple. You do what you do unless there is a need to do something else. A scientist is free to think what he wants.

Technologist always goes to the user

A programmer has to follow the instructions unless something else comes up. A programmer does not decide what will work unless the programmer is told to do so. Even if the programmer knows what is right, a technologist always goes to the user to decide what the user wants to do. For a scientist, the application of science is guided by philosophy.

The application of technology is not. The application of technology is guided by the needs of the users. There is no need to know what the users want. The needs of the users are the needs.

Friends, You may also like this Video.

Read More

'The Importance of Science' Essay For Class 10

643 Words Essay by : K. STOVALL

As man descended from the trees and began the journey into the future science was born from the first step upon the ground. The daughter of necessity, science was the truth by which we fed. No only did our inept knowledge of science sustain our bodies helping our physicals selves survive and evolve but it nurtured our minds leading us down the path towards humanity. Early man with their herbs, mushrooms and one can imagine some humorous trial and error lead future generations of man into what would become the basis by which every moment of our existence has been built on to this day.

Throughout the ages science, although not always named so, was foundation by which human life survived. Unfortunately,science became superstition and the less evolved leaf on the tree of humanity saw its' mystery as magic and began to persecute early practitioners of what would become know as the dark arts. The brightest minds of the time risked death to advance their knowledge of the laws of physics, the heavens and medicine.In the 1600's Galileo Galilei was actually convicted of heresy for proclaiming that the Earth was not the center of the Universe. Our next moment of idiocy would come when primitive medicinal practices were declared to be witchcraft and therefore unholy which led to an untold number of murders. The only culture that not only survived these brief moments of extreme philosophical or scientific bias was China who flourished while continually advanced their understanding of science. The understanding and advancement of science in China actually dates back two thousand years and some ancient practices such as acupuncture are still preformed today all over the world.

It was not until fairly recently that mankind truly was free to delve into all aspects of known sciences. Science was no longer the daughter of necessity. Brilliant minds such as Jules Verne, James Fenimore Cooper, Alexandre Dumas as well as a few slightly disturbed ones began to dream of what could be. Far off worlds filled with fantastic imaginings. They dreamed of leaving earth just as the first humans left the trees. Traveling through wormholes and the possibility of alien intelligence adrift on earth like planets even other dimensions. These dreams commonly called science-fiction novels soon replaced necessity. Children that read these imaginings turned into adults who endeavored to turn science-fiction into science fact. We as a species reached the pinnacle of our existence. Scientific achievements came as fast as the speed of light. Of course their were more failures than successes thank goodness that passion fueled their drive to try and try and then try again. One hundred and twenty-five years ago the radio was only a dream today we have landed a satellite on a comet, there are plans to colonize Mars and cars that drive themselves. One can't speak of such success with mentioning the tragic successes that usually were born of war such as the atomic bomb which ushered in its' own era of death and destruction or the improvements in weaponry all of which remind us we are not as advance or intelligent as we could be. We can only hope future scientists realize that a scientific achievement can also occur within the mind not just the world.

I look at all the techno-junkies glued to their smart phones watching videos of cats and singing two year olds and I can't help but think about the 1969. The world glued to televisions, that generations the cutting edge technology, watching a rocket take off, fly for three days, finally coming to rest the one celestial body that every man woman and child that ever live gazed upon with wonder and awe and we did it with less than eight percent% of the computing power that we hold in our hands and watch you-tube videos.

Read More

Essay About Scientist For Class 6

416 Words Essay on Scientist

Physics, Chemistry, Math; some people’s worst nightmare and a beautiful world for others. Career paths are life’s biggest choices and one of the most confusing decisions that haunt most children as well as adults.

We begin very early thinking about a career for our children, in fact too early for them to be able to understand the different choices they have as well as what they truly desire in their heart of hearts. Despite the vast Ocean of opportunities, career choices seem to be strangely limited these days owing to the fact that India as a country is completely in love with two specific professions being Doctor and Engineer. In such a situation, children are extremely confused and sometimes tend to lose interest in serious career building and would prefer to just go with the flow. This is a worrying trend because it results in loss of talent to millions of other industries because most of the potential archaeologists and forensic experts would be graduating as software engineers.

The role of a “scientist” in a broader sense for the world today is too great to fathom. Without scientists we would be way back in time when prayers would be told to keep diseases away and the vast sky above would merely be a huge mystery forever. A keen interest in science at a very early age can pave the way for a tremendous career. Love for physics, chemistry and mathematics is not one sees every day and must not be side-lined. The world of science has more than a few fascinating career choices to offer. Microbiologist, Neuroscientist, Astronaut, Oceanographer, Forensic science technician, Radiologist, Meteorologist, Ecologist, Geologist being a few; all of which require extensive study and true passion.

Parents discourage children from taking up science in college because they fear that going forward as a scientist could be extremely challenging and their child could end up being a mere professor or teacher with an average pay check. Besides, the fancy world of Information Technology and the unbelievable pay scales associated with it lure people into giving up their passion and blindly following the crowd. Parents and teachers need to give up their irrational love for the IT industry and guide students to work towards a more serious and fulfilling career. If your child does exceptionally well at science, encourage him/her to pursue a career in the more respectable professions mentioned above so that our country has more people who contribute towards its prosperity and advancement.

Read More

Essay on Science Teachers For Class 10

542 Words Essay

Undoubtedly, teaching science is a valuable career for people with a good aptitude and deep passion for the subject. Many people ponder over the question- how to be a science teacher?

Today, science teaching jobs is not only appealing to college students belonging to a science discipline, but also to the professionals who plan to switch their careers later in life and decide to teach science.

In today’s time, the need for teachers belonging to the STEM that is Science, Technology, Engineering and Math fields as compared to other fields is consistently growing high all over the world.

This guide will provide you the brief insights into the essential education, job viewpoint and salary of the science teaching profession.

A brief job description of Science teacher - Science teachers not only assist in answering the different type of questions, but also they motivate their students to look for the answers for themselves so that they can explore and know about new things. A science education includes subjects like astronomy, biology, chemistry, physics, marine science, and a few other courses based on the physical sciences. By means of several lab experiments, mixed media materials, field trips, and computer research, you’ll have the chance to inspire students to delve into the natural world from which they are surrounded and know about the latest and evolving scientific theories. If you are a high or middle school science teacher, then teaching science may also require organizing various school science fairs and coaching. For college professors, organizing research and writing papers for journal submission are a crucial part of the science teacher job description.

Who makes good science teachers? The science teacher responsibilities are huge. A good science teacher can be someone who is:
• An analytical thinker.
• Patient.
• Interested and well-informed about science.
• Keen to know about teaching and engaging with students.
• Willing to work hard.
• Socially intelligent and culturally skilled.
• Focused to learn new things and staying updated in the field.
• Able to work flexibly and collaboratively with colleagues.
• Resourceful.

Professional development for science teachers: There are many science teachers who keep on taking various courses throughout their teaching careers in order to perfect their classroom skills and also maintain their teaching credentials updated. Usually, the teachers attend workshops, though development can also turn as the form of cohort performance, coaching or research. NSTA, an acronym for “National Science Teachers Association” provides a professional development which is in the form of conferences organized many times every year.

Perks of continuing education: Teachers having a master’s degree usually have a higher chance for jumping up and a hike in salary. Once obtaining the useful qualifications, and certifications, the science teacher salary gets increased remarkably, making your career secured.

Most of the New York science teacher is increasingly attending the different professional development especially meant for science teachers. By attending such programs/courses, they brush up their skills and stay updated to the latest trends and information.

Jobs available to science teachers beyond teaching: Having additional certifications or education, there are several doors opened for science teachers such as they can become school librarians, school counselors, instructional coordinators, an educational administrator, assistant principals, or principal at a college or university.

Read More

My Favourite Subject Science Essay | For Class 5

(413 Words):

Every student has his like and dislike for a subject. Favourite subject like science has the highest liking vote of the students. It is because of its logical sense.

We human being are the best creation of the God. And almighty has made this universe very much scientific. Actually scientific word tag is attached by us, but God has already made the universe religiously logical, usable and beneficial for us. At the same time he also blessed us with a powerful tool like intelligence to extract more from the surroundings for the welfare of humanity. This explanation is nothing but science.

In general sense we love to engage ourselves. Friends, school, study and playing are the best opportunities in our early life to enrich our early time interesting and entertaining.  Study takes the major part of our daily life. It can be easily noticed that few students frequently used to read their favourite subjects because they get interest from the subject. I also get much satisfaction in reading science subject. I never miss science class. It is as much entertaining for me that I do not apply more effort for science and I score always highest in this subject. It also reflect that I am very much curious in nature and therefore this subject naturally attract me. I have hate relationship with few other subjects like history, geography etc. I have to read these forcefully  to keep up my percentage marks at best. In lower classes I scored less, but at harder time I came up strongly with science subject ; which rewarded me much to rank in the class. This was very much satisfactory for my parents as they needed me to score high in math and science. Now I do fun with my study as I got my favourite subjects thereby leaving burden of my disliked subjects. It doesn't mean that I was blind towards other subjects but I scored satisfactorily in those and strongly in science subjects to  stand up with full strength in higher classes.

I like to read theories and related proof. I choose to the questions that has sum to get full marks. I find it very easy to solve the sum of science. I think the science is the real solution of human beings. The benefit of science made it very much popular. Now we solve our social problem in scientific way. This approach gave the new branch of studies like social science and social technologies.

Read More

Curiosity is the Mother of Inventions Essay

  (496 words): Curiosity is a strong desire to know something. As depth and width of curiosity spreads its wings, then a new machine or method born as invention. Therefore we can say that the title of this essay has got its justification. Scientific temperament and inquisitiveness assist curiosity to generate invention. Therefore in scientific socialism we can say that curiosity is the mother of invention. 

Curiosity is what my four years old son asks me many questions continuously while passing by market side. Another practical way of explaining curiosity is watching a polar Bear on Discovery channel, inspecting a remote camera with his legs. If anyone has seen this scene then he can perceive the exact meaning of curiosity.

After buying an assembled computer's packets, we remain very much curious to open every layer of the pack to know the originality of the product, or to see the look of the product etc. We have also noticed that our kids are even more curious to open any packets and we scold them to not be in hurry. So curiosity of the kids becomes so strong that we have to catch their hand to stop them. These are all examples of natural curiosities.

Human beings and few other animals are designed by God such that they want to unlock every unknown and hidden secrets or things in this world. This is the prime drive for any invention. This drives also comes from necessity and from need of overcoming  barrier of human life.

Invention is that new purposeful machine, method, process etc that need strong desire and determination. If anything new happen on this globe we can say this invention. Sometime invention happens because of necessity. At this situation structured curiosity comes in between necessity and invention. Most of the fighter equipment's inventions are the outcome of this type of curiosity. Necessity for controlling the world demanded forced inventions of war equipment and machines. And we may agree that these inventions are proved to be dangerous for human beings because mass human killings were assisted by this type of equipment. So we can conclude that curiosity is bringing us towards devastation.  

When curiosity is pursued for a good objective then healer invention comes into existence. We can illustrate the curiosity of Charles Babbage; whose theory gave us one of the most usable machines as computer. He was very curious student. Mathematics and science were his favourite subjects. He was very much curious about creating a machine; which might not make mistake. As he was very much tired of human errors. His idea was not to create computer but his main idea was to get rid of human math computing errors. Whatever may be the case but his curiosity eventually did the highest wonder in the world. And we got the fastest machine as computer. His curiosity gave birth to a more powerful machine instead of a Math error handler. The curiosity of Charles Babbage found a mountain while pursuing a hill.

Keywords:natural curiosities, define curiosity, curiosity rover, inventions ideas, best new inventions, new technology inventions

Read More

Science in everyday life Essay

Science has affected our daily living system at larger scale. Or it can be said that it has penetarated our life fully. We are limbless without it. In todays time life can not be imagined without science. Roti , Kapada aur Makan has become Roti , Kapda , Makan and Moblie. So here one scientific product has been attached to our need. So science is not optional , but has turned compulsery.

If you think science doesn't matter  to you, think again. Science affects us all, every day of the year, from the moment we wake up, all day long, and through the night.

Digital alarm clock,
 the weather report,
Cell phone,
 The medicines,
The clean water ,
 and the light that you turn off at the end of the day have all been brought to you courtesy of science. The modern world would not be modern at all without the understandings and technology enabled by science.

Scientific knowledge can improve the quality of life at many different levels — from the routine workings of our everyday lives to global issues. Science informs public policy and personal decisions on energy, conservation, agriculture, health, transportation, communication, defense, economics, leisure, and exploration. It's almost impossible to overstate how many aspects of modern life are impacted by scientific knowledge. Here we'll discuss just a few of these examples. You can investigate:

Read More

Essay On Science

                                       Total- 581 Words

Know Science:

Science (from Latin: scientia meaning "knowledge") is a systematic enterprise that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of testable explanations and predictions about the world. An older and closely related meaning still in use today is that of Aristotle, for whom scientific knowledge was a body of reliable knowledge that can be logically and rationally explained 

Since classical antiquity science as a type of knowledge was closely linked to philosophy. In the early modern era the two words, "science" and "philosophy", were sometimes used interchangeably in the English language. By the 17th century, "natural philosophy" (which is today called "natural science") had begun to be considered separately from "philosophy" in general. However, "science" continued to be used in a broad sense denoting reliable knowledge about a topic, in the same way it is still used in modern terms such as library science or political science.

Scinec and we:

We live in the age of science. Science has brought about a lot of changes in the life of man. It is due to science that man is leading a comfortable and secured life life.artificialsatellites, television, computers, robbots, aeroplanesect.are all the gifts of science. Most of the things we use in our life are the result of the inventions of science.

Due to science the world has become smaller. Time and distance have been overpowered by science. We can reach distant places in a few hours. Even our domestic life has been changed by science, now we cook our food on gas stoves. Man has achieved great success by conquering space .Man has landed on moon. In developed countries most of the domestic work is done by robot. Computer is the latest achievement of our scientists.

In medical field also science has brought many changes. X ray machines and other gadgets help the doctors in revealing the inner portion of the body. Science is being applied in the agricultural fields. Tractors have taken the place of traditional bullocks and plough. Through science we do not feel heat in summer and cold in winter. It has changed our social life also. We can talk to our friends and relatives who are at a distance of thousand kilometers.

Electricity is now used in place of coal; new dams are being built to control the flood water. Chemicals are being used in fields. It can convert a desert into a fertile land. But science has also produced deadly weapons for mankind and therefore there is always fear of world war. On the whole science has been beneficial to mankind.

"Science is built of facts the way a house is built of bricks: but an accumulation of facts is no more science than a pile of bricks is a house" (Henri Poincare). 

Although bricks are the basic essentials of constructing a house, a house is not purely made out of bricks.   Through simply stacking bricks on top of each other will not lead to a house.   Without a proper foundation and something to stick the bricks together, it is likely that the house will collapse.   In accordance with Poincare’s statement, science is quite similar to the idea of a house.   With only the knowledge of facts and formulas, and no connections in between them, they are quite useless.   This metaphor applies to other areas of knowledge, such as the arts, as well.   A painting is built of strokes; a song is built of notes, but without the “cement” to connect the strokes and notes, 

Read More

Essay on Science and Religion

Total- 782 Words

Religion gives correct Direction to the Life:

This essay is written for general thinker not for spiritual thinker. As science and religion are two very conflicting subjects. Therefore in this essay science has been more prioritized than religion. But if I think from my own point of view and from the very realistic concern   then I will keep religion always at the most supreme position and science has no ground there. It is because religion start at the point where  power scale of science ends. But let us start keeping the science at super state.

Value of each is Referential:

Science and religion are two different aspects of life. Both have their own importance and values. History tells us that the two have always been in conflict in the; religion was always important and reigned supremely in every sphere of life. But gradually its place was taken by science. Today science is far more important than religion. This is felt by many. 

Outlook is different:

But   there are basic differences between the outlook of science and religion. The outlook of science is rational. Science believes in experiment and observation. It teaches its followers that nothing is to be believed until it has been proved to be true through experiments. Religion, on the other hand, is a matter of faith. It teaches its followers to believes and have faith in the teaching of religious teachers and the authority of religious books. Thus whatever is written in the ‘VEDAS’ Quran, Bible or the ‘GITA’ is true, because it is the word of GOD himself. The existence of god cannot be proved but it can be felt by those who have faith. It is all a matter of faith and not of experiment or observation.

Religion is the Ultimate Truth but not the Sience:

Scientific truths are tentative. Science believes that nothing is absolutely true. What is regarded as true today may be proved to be false the very next day by further experiments and observations. Thus, there was a time when the earth was supposed to be motionless and the sun was supposed to go round it. Gradually science proved that this was wrong and showed that it is the earth which goes round the sun. Similarly, Newton’s law of GRAVITATION held the day till Einstein came out with his superior theory of relativity. In this way, science advances towards truth as absolute. Whatever is written in religious books is regarded as absolutely true. Anyone who criticizes the teaching of religion is considered to be a heretic and is violently condemned. In the past, those who dared to question a religious truth were mercilessly persecuted and punished. The example of GALILEO readily comes to mind in this connection. In short, science is progressive and dynamic while religion are static and orthodox.

Science advance from the particular to the general laws and principles. Thus, NEWTON saw an apple falling, observed a number of other similarity phenomena, and finally developed, on the basis of his observations his famous laws of gravitation. Religion, on the other hand, works from the general to particular. Its methods are entirely different from those of science. Scientific laws and theories are based on a much sounder foundation than the principles of religion.

With the advancement of science, religion has gradually lost ground. Its truths have been subjected to searching analysis by science, one after another, and have been proved to be false. The methods of science have appeared more convincing and rational and people have gradually lost faith in religion. Science has also conquered the heart of the people by its practical utility. The practical applications of its laws has provided man with undreamed of comforts and luxuries, religions has no such visible and material benefits to offer.

However, science has its own limitations. Man has a body as well as a spirit. Science is concerned only with the body; it can do nothing for the sprit. Science may provide man with physical comforts, but it is religion alone which can give him the courage to struggle against heavy odds. He may even face death itself, with a smiling face. It is religion and religion alone, which can bring the healing balm for his wondered spirit.

In the end it may be mentioned that religion is a social phenomenon as well as personal and individual. It is all a matter of individual belief. Science has weakened religious faith is only as it is a social phenomenon. Science has not been able to touch religion, even the least, in its personal and individual aspects. There are people even today whose faith in the name of the religion remains unshaken and who can still make the maximum sacrifice in the name of religion. It would, therefore be wrong to say that science has made man irreligious or that it is an enemy of morality.

Read More

Essay on "Blessing Or Curse of Science."

Everything in the universe has its uses and abuses. The same applies to science. Science has revolutionized the human existence. It has made man's life happier and more comfortable.

Electricity is one of the greatest wonders of modern science. The growth of fast modes of transport and communication has changed the world into global village. In the field of agriculture, science has helped in increasing the crop production and improving quality. Science has enabled man to diagnose and treat many dangerous diseases. Information technology and computers have revolutionized our life-styles. But, the boon of science, in many cases, has been turned into bane because of its misuse. Science has posed a threat to the very existence of mankind with weapons-nuclear, biological, atomic, chemical etc. Cyber crime is the latest addition to crimes' list. Misapplication of science has brought mankind to the path of destruction. We should use science to get its blessings and not misuse it to make it a curse.

Science has revolutionized the human existence. Much of the progress that mankind has made in different fields right from the stone age to the modern age is due to the progress made in the field of science. Not only material progress but also the mental outlook of man has been influenced by it. It has made man's life happier and more comfortable. Agriculture, business, transport, communication and medicine to name a few are all highly indebted to the wonders, science has produced. We have become scientifically more advanced from our ancestors. This is because the world has undergone a tremendous change because of the rapid strides made by the science and technology.

Electricity is one of the greatest wonders of modern science. It is a source of energy. It can run any type of machinery. With the help of electricity, we can light our rooms, run buses and trains, and lift water for irrigation.

The discovery and development of a large number of powerful energy sources-coal, petroleum, natural gas, electricity etc. have enabled humanity to conquer the barriers of nature. All this has facilitated the growth of fast modes of transport and communication, which in turn has changed the world into a global village. Science has given man the means of traveling-cars, trains, aero-planes, ships etc. man has even traveled to the moon.

Science is a help in the agriculture field too. The food production levels and quality have improved by multiple factors. Soil analysis, hybrid varieties of crops giving higher yield, fertilizers, pesticides, advanced tools and machinery, irrigation equipments, etc. have increased the production of crops.

Today, we have scores of meteorological satellites in outer space sending data, pictures to earth stations helping agriculture scientists find and analyze soil patterns. They also help them trace progress of rains, winds and even locusts that endanger crops.

Satellites even forewarn about natural calamities, like hurricanes which cause mass destruction. Science has enabled man to diagnose and treat many dangerous diseases. Open heart surgeries, organ transplants etc. have all become possible. A number of killer diseases are now curable. Diseases such as smallpox, polio, plague, malaria etc. have now almost been eradicated. Hidden diseases in the body can be diagnosed easily with the help of X-rays. Scientists have succeeded in cloning animals. The methods of diagnosis, prevention and treatment have developed with a rapid speed. As a result of this much progress in medical science, man finds himself more safe, secure and his average age has lengthened.

Man, with the help of science, has been able to increase longevity, arrest the gradual decay of human body and control the spread of lethal diseases by making extraordinary life prolonging drugs and medicines. Science has provided us with many means of education and entertainment. The television, video, radio, computer, internet etc. have enabled the human race to enrich its knowledge about various places, persons, birds, animals etc.

Information technology and computers have revolutionized our life-styles. Automation in banks and railway stations have provided relief to the public and staff alike. Ticketing and reservation have become more efficient and convenient. In medical diagnosis, computers are being used to locate and investigate accurately and precisely any abnormalities or diseases. Internet has some very useful applications in our day-to-day life. Mobile phones are outcome of information technology. But at the same time it cannot be denied that the boon in many cases, has turned to be bane. There are innumerous examples which prove that science-a blessing has been turned into a curse.

Sir Alfred Nobel experimented with dynamite to clear huge mountains to turn it into productive land. but modern man is using it to kill his fellow human beings and destroy nature. The destructive potential of atomic energy was witnessed in August 1945, when the United States dropped atom booms on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Those who survived the nuclear bombing suffered from its aftermath. It is a horrible fact that much of the national income of even a developing country is spent on acquiring latest weapons, bombs and missiles. Guns, revolvers, tanks and fighter planes, explosives, nuclear bombs etc. were invented to develop a strong security system to protect the innocent masses, but their misuse is now crushing humanity. Apart from atomic weapons, man has also started stockpiling biological and chemical weapons. These weapons are also extremely dangerous.

Biotechnology is a great boon for fighting the diseases. But along with medicines lethal biological weapons have also been developed. Germs are deliberately released into the air to spread diseases. Anthrax envelopes are used for spreading terrorism.

The negative effects of the excessive use of fertilizers and pesticides, used to increase yield, are now evident. soil salinity has increased. Traces of DDT are found in plants.

Establishment and expansion of factories has resulted in all round pollution. Motor vehicles emit a lot of poisonous material into the atmosphere. This has led to the depletion of the ozone layer and global warming.

Television, a good source of entertainment, education and information, has its negative effects too. There are many programmes which promote violence and vulgarity, and teenagers are more interested in watching these programmes. Aggressiveness and violence at an early age have lead to shocking crimes. Sometimes, even the nature people learn and apply different methods of crime by watching serials and movies.

The power of the internet is being abused by the widespread use of pornographic material. Lots of people spend their time in chat rooms for obscene discussions.

Science has two faces-good and bad. It depends on us which face we want to see. If we use the gifts of science in positive direction with positive intention then it will provide us with sweet results but if we use it in the wrong way the results will definitely be bitter. To save ourselves and the world as a whole from destruction, we should follow the right way to use the gifts of science so that it appears as a blessing and not as a curse.

Read More